CML Insight, Inc.
  • Platform
  • Research
  • Team
  • Careers
Book a working session
CML Insight, Inc.
Book a sessionBook a working session
CML Insight Logo

CML Insight, Inc.

Austin, Texas

United States (English)

Follow us

Industries

  • Higher Education
  • K12 Education
  • Healthcare
  • Water Utilities
  • Fintech
  • Social Impact
  • Compare industries

Company

  • Team
  • Careers
  • Research
  • Security
  • Request a demo
  • Contact

Resources

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Sitemap
  • Accessibility

Contact

info@cmlinsight.com

© 2026 CML Insight, Inc. All rights reserved.

PrivacyTerms
∫₀^∞ e^(-x²) dx = √π/2∑ᵢ₌₁ⁿ (xᵢ - μ)² / nf(x) = ∑ₙ₌₀^∞ aₙ(x-c)ⁿP(A|B) = P(B|A)·P(A) / P(B)∇·E = ρ/ε₀λₙ = 2L/n, n = 1,2,3,...lim[x→∞] (1 + 1/x)^x = e∇×B = μ₀J + μ₀ε₀∂E/∂t∂u/∂t = α∇²uσ² = E[(X-μ)²]∮ F·dr = ∬(∇×F)·dSE = mc²det(A) = ∑σ sgn(σ)∏ᵢaᵢ,σ(ᵢ)Ψ = A·e^(i(kx-ωt))H(X) = -∑ₓP(x)log₂P(x)∂²ψ/∂x² = (1/v²)∂²ψ/∂t²eⁱᵖ + 1 = 0∇²φ = 4πGρδ(x) = ∫₋∞^∞ eⁱᵏˣdk/2π
  1. Home
  2. Industries
  3. K12 Education

Know which actions will improve student outcomes, and by how much

From chronic absenteeism to literacy, we help schools and districts find which support helps which student. Evidence is matched to each student, outcomes are measured prospectively, and the staff who deliver support get better at causal reasoning along the way.
Book a working sessionSee the proof

Start with one decision, using data you already have. We show it first on synthetic data shaped like yours.

+0.2 SDreading gain,Kids Read Now30studies in the attendanceevidence library6lifecycle models,National Universityn-of-1causal learningper student

Schools and education partners we work with

  • East Central ISD
  • KidsReadNow
Most analytics tell you what already happened

Prediction shows risk. Causation shows the way forward.

Most early-warning tools tell you which students are at risk. CML+ estimates which support will actually change the outcome, and by how much.

Prediction

Who is at risk?

  • A risk flag for each student
  • Little guidance on which support fits the cause
  • Can't tell which interventions actually worked
Causation

What will help, and did it?

  • Each student's likely root cause, and the expected effect of each support on your menu
  • Every recommendation shows its basis: district, research or colleague judgement
  • Measured impact, so time and budgets follow what works

How it compares with what you already have

CML+ builds on your dashboards and analysts rather than replacing them, starting from your SIS, MTSS, attendance, nurse and transportation data.

Compared onBI dashboardsIn-house analystsConsultantsCML+
AnswersWhat happenedThe questions they have time forOne question, onceWhich support changes the outcome, for which students, by how much
Keeps learningNoWhen staffedEnds with the reportEach outcome updates the evidence for the next recommendation
Who can use itAnalysts and leadersAnalystsSponsorsSuperintendents, assistant principals, counselors and nurses, each in their own terms
Works withThe reports you already buildThe data they can reachExtracts for one engagementYour SIS, MTSS, attendance, nurse and transportation data

BI dashboards

Answers
What happened
Keeps learning
No
Who can use it
Analysts and leaders
Works with
The reports you already build

In-house analysts

Answers
The questions they have time for
Keeps learning
When staffed
Who can use it
Analysts
Works with
The data they can reach

Consultants

Answers
One question, once
Keeps learning
Ends with the report
Who can use it
Sponsors
Works with
Extracts for one engagement

CML+

Answers
Which support changes the outcome, for which students, by how much
Keeps learning
Each outcome updates the evidence for the next recommendation
Who can use it
Superintendents, assistant principals, counselors and nurses, each in their own terms
Works with
Your SIS, MTSS, attendance, nurse and transportation data
Questions we answer

From "who is at risk" to "what will help, and did it?"

Attendance and engagement

Why is this student missing school, which support from our menu fits that cause, and is it working for them?

Student success and persistence

Which advising, nudges and course designs improve enrollment, persistence and completion, and for whom?

Literacy and learning programs

Did the program raise outcomes compared with similar schools, and in which groups?

Staff capacity

When a coordinating role is cut, software carries identification, root cause, matching and evaluation, and people keep the relationships.
How the platform works
Built on the CML+ platform

K12 Education Products

Attendance AI carries the parts of attendance work that software can carry, and keeps the human parts with people.

IllustrativeEvidence → recommendation → learningDistrict evidenceattendance · nurse · busResearch evidence30-study RWE libraryColleague judgementassistant principalsRecommendation per studentroot cause · menu option · effect · basisMulti-armed banditallocation shifts toward what worksoutcomes update evidenceStaff act, and learn whytalking points · explanations · no automated decisions

Attendance AI

A causal AI attendance app that learns what brings students back: who to reach, why they are likely missing school, and which support is most likely to help.

  • A daily ranked list against the district's own attendance checkpoints
  • Likely root causes, and recommendations from the district's intervention menu
  • Each recommendation shows its basis: district, research or colleague judgement
  • Every outcome flows back, so recommendations shift toward what works
For assistant principals, counselors and nurses

Built with East Central ISD. Screens are illustrative.

Built for everyone who has to say yes

What each role gets

Leaders who sign

Superintendents and district leaders

Which supports and programs to keep funding, and which to stop. Impact estimates you can take to your board. Evidence from a pilot before any larger commitment.

People who use it

Assistant principals, counselors, nurses (and families)

Why each student is flagged and why each option is recommended. Talking points for family conversations, and plain-language messages for families. Causal reasoning skills built through daily use, not separate training.

IT and security reviewers

District IT, security and data governance

Built and demonstrated first on synthetic data that mirrors your district's structure, before any student data is shared. Works from SIS, MTSS and attendance extracts you control. Every recommendation can be overridden by staff.

How we handle security
Proof from our engagements

Where these applications are working

Each item is CML Insight's own work with the named partner. Status is shown as it stands today.

In progress
Attendance AI · K-12 case study

East Central ISD: a causal AI app that learns what brings students back

A San Antonio-area district lost its Programs Facilitator, the role that coordinated its response to chronic absenteeism. Together we built Attendance AI, an app that carries the parts of that role software can carry, keeps the human parts with people, and gets smarter every week.

Challenge

Chronic absenteeism of 23.5% against a district goal of 20% (August 2026 baseline). With the facilitator role eliminated, identification, root-cause work, intervention matching and attendance-coding checks fell to assistant principals who already had two other jobs.

Evidence

Every recommendation links enterprise evidence (the district's own attendance, discipline, grades, nurse visits and bus routes) with real-world evidence: a 30-study evidence library that includes null and negative findings. Each one shows its basis: District, Research or Colleague judgement.

Approach

A daily ranked list against the district's own checkpoint table, likely root causes from 13 district categories, and recommendations from the district's closed intervention menu. Impact is measured with several causal methods and validated first on synthetic data with planted effects.

Continuous learning

Interventions on the menu run as prospective multi-armed bandits: allocation shifts toward what works for each root cause while the district keeps learning, and each outcome updates the evidence for the next recommendation.

Upskilling

Assistant principals, counselors and nurses see why each student is flagged and why each option is recommended, with talking points for family conversations. Staff build causal reasoning through daily use, not separate training.

Evidence → recommendation → learningDistrict evidenceattendance · nurse · busResearch evidence30-study RWE libraryColleague judgementassistant principalsRecommendation per studentroot cause · menu option · effect · basisMulti-armed banditallocation shifts toward what worksoutcomes update evidenceStaff act, and learn whytalking points · explanations · no automated decisions

Software carries the routine

Identification, root cause, intervention matching, attendance-coding accuracy checks and evaluation.

People keep the relationships

504 meetings, home visits and family conversations stay with staff, and every recommendation can be overridden.

Privacy first

Built and demonstrated on synthetic data that mirrors the district's structure before any real student data was shared.

Result

KidsReadNow

KidsReadNow logo

+0.2 SD in 3rd-grade reading (about 7 percentile points) vs. comparison schools.

+0.2 SD3rd-grade reading vs. non-KRN schools (about 7 percentile points)

Challenge

Too little data to judge whether the program worked, and for whom.

Approach

Combined public and private data with fuzzy matching, then used causal AI to estimate impact across student groups and schools.

Result

A measurable reading gain, and staff now able to run their own experiments.

Bring one decision you want to get right.

Book a working session
How to start

Start with a pilot, not a transformation

A low-lift pilot on one campus or intervention, using data you already have: evidence before any larger commitment.

  1. 1

    Pick one decision

    One campus, grade or intervention you need to get right, such as chronic absenteeism or a literacy program.

  2. 2

    Use the data you have

    SIS, MTSS and attendance extracts. We first show your views on synthetic data shaped like your district.

  3. 3

    Decide on evidence

    See which supports worked, for which students and by how much, then decide whether to scale.

Start with synthetic data shaped like your district

See your own dashboards, recommendations and evaluation views before any student data is shared.

Book a working session

What happens next

  1. We reply within one business day.
  2. A 45-minute working session works through your decision with you.
  3. We show a prototype on synthetic data shaped like yours.